<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brad Carlile Photo Blog &#187; physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/tag/physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog</link>
	<description>Fine Art Photography www.bradcarlile.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Linked in Friday no.5</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/links/linked-in-friday-no-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/links/linked-in-friday-no-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sculpture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=1264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;Most Fridays I&#8217;ll try to post links to a variety o thangs&#8230;
Art:

Cezanne: Can&#8217;t quit you man
American Kinetic sculpture at BMW: selling it
LA Traffic Photos, and the maths behind it

Physics:

A Lecture Missed: What is Time Anyway
Reality problem: Electrons&#8230;

Economics:

Capitalism: Basically Feudalism

Math:

 Cities: Crazy coincidences or the basic geometry


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Most Fridays I&#8217;ll try to post links to a variety o thangs&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Art:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Can't quit you man" href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1881981,00.html" target="_blank">Cezanne: Can&#8217;t quit you man</a></li>
<li><a title="Kinetic sculpture" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TJFntVSzd0" target="_blank">American Kinetic sculpture at BMW: selling it</a></li>
<li><a title="Traffic Photos" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2009/05/every-angeleno-has-had-mid-gridlock-fantasies-of-pushing-a-magic-red-button-on-their-dashboard-beaming-up-over-the-405-and-e.html">LA Traffic Photos</a>, and <a title="http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/math-and-the-city/" href="http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/math-and-the-city/">the maths behind it</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Physics:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Most distant Objety" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/space/5237960/Scientists-snap-most-distant-object-in-the-universe---13-billion-light-years-away.html" target="_blank">A Lecture Missed: What is Time Anyway</a></li>
<li><a title="Electrons" href="http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/20231?in=00:00&amp;out=70:35" target="_blank">Reality problem: Electrons&#8230;</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Economics:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Capitalism Feudalism" href="http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/06/the-capitalist-manifesto-how-to-modernize-capitalism-from-feudalism-to-democracy-by-evert-cilliers.html#more" target="_blank">Capitalism: Basically Feudalism</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Math:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <a title="City math" href="http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/math-and-the-city/" target="_blank">Cities: Crazy coincidences or the basic geometry<br />
</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/links/linked-in-friday-no-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linked in Friday no.4</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/links/linked-in-friday-no4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/links/linked-in-friday-no4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;Most Fridays I&#8217;ll try to post links to a variety o thangs&#8230;
Art:

SFMOMA: Brought to Light: Microscopy and Taaffe
American photography’s relationship to Hopper &#38; Companion Book: Edward Hopper &#38; Company: Hopper&#8217;s Influence on Photography
low-contrast female vs high-contrast male?

Physics:

Scientists image most distant object in the universe 13-billion light-years away

Maps:

National Geo: Place name maps

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Most Fridays I&#8217;ll try to post links to a variety o thangs&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Art:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="SF MOMA Microscopy" href="http://www.artsjournal.com/man/2009/02/brought_to_light_microscopy.html" target="_blank">SFMOMA: Brought to Light: Microscopy and Taaffe</a></li>
<li><a title="American photography relationship to Hopper" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/arts/design/01fink.html?_r=1&amp;ref=arts&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">American photography’s relationship to Hopper</a> &amp; <a title="Companion book: Edward Hopper &amp; Company: Hopper's Influence on Photography" href="http://www.powells.com/biblio/1-9781881337263-0" target="_blank">Companion Book: Edward Hopper &amp; Company: Hopper&#8217;s Influence on Photography</a></li>
<li><a title="SF MOMA Microscopy" href="http://illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com/cat/top-10-finalists/2009/#post-1072" target="_blank">low-contrast female vs high-contrast male?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Physics:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Most distant Objety" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/space/5237960/Scientists-snap-most-distant-object-in-the-universe---13-billion-light-years-away.html" target="_blank">Scientists image most distant object in the universe 13-billion light-years away</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Maps:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Maps and Place names" href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2009/04/departments/native-names-interactive" target="_blank">National Geo: Place name maps</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/links/linked-in-friday-no4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linked in Friday no.3</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/linked-in-friday-no3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/linked-in-friday-no3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please, check my blog on Monday for an my exciting Art announcement, this one is cool! (6-March: sorry for the delay on any announcement, I&#8217;m still waiting for the official press release).
&#8230;Most Fridays I&#8217;ll try to post links to a variety o thangs&#8230;
Art:

Michael Fried: Why Photography Matters

Physics:

Entanglement and our presumption of &#8220;Locality&#8221;, Einsteinian errors?

Design:

Idea for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, check my blog on Monday for an my exciting Art announcement, this one is cool! (6-March: sorry for the delay on any announcement, I&#8217;m still waiting for the official press release).</p>
<p>&#8230;Most Fridays I&#8217;ll try to post links to a variety o thangs&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Art:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Placename map" href="http://www.artreview.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1474022%3ABlogPost%3A633" target="_blank">Michael Fried: Why Photography Matters</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Physics:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Physics &amp; Locality" href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=was-einstein-wrong-about-relativity" target="_blank">Entanglement and our presumption of &#8220;Locality&#8221;, Einsteinian errors?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Design:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Physics &amp; Locality" href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/27/europes-grass-lined-green-railways-good-urban-design/" target="_blank">Idea for Portland&#8217;s Trimet &amp; other Public Transportation?</a></li>
<li><a title="Physics &amp; Locality" href="http://www.ecosalon.com/9_Life_Changing_Inventions_the_Experts_Said_Would_Never_Work/" target="_blank">Inventions that experts say wouldn&#8217;t work</a></li>
<li><a title="Art Car" href=" http://www.bavauto.com/sc_photo_view.asp?viewid=653" target="_blank">The Art Car I own at Bavarian Autoworks website</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/linked-in-friday-no3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garrett Lisi Theory of Everything and E8 Symmetry</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/garrett-lisi-theory-of-everything-and-e8-symmetry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/garrett-lisi-theory-of-everything-and-e8-symmetry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A year ago, I posted a link to Murray Gell-Mann&#8217;s TED talk called, Beauty and truth in physics.  In this  talk Gell-Mann talked a lot about about symmetry.
Basically &#8220;things&#8221; with some form of symmetry have characteristics that don’t change under certain transformations (read &#8220;change&#8221;).  Beautiful.  Symmetry goes way beyond most people&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1010" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1010" title="Portion of E8" src="http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/e8.jpg" alt="Portion of E8" width="300" height="435" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Portion of E8</p></div>
<p>A year ago, I posted a link to Murray Gell-Mann&#8217;s TED talk called, <a href="http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/murray-gell-mann-beauty-and-truth-in-physics/" target="_blank">Beauty and truth in physics</a>.  In this  talk Gell-Mann talked a lot about about symmetry.</p>
<p>Basically &#8220;things&#8221; with some form of symmetry have characteristics that don’t change under certain transformations (read &#8220;change&#8221;).  Beautiful.  Symmetry goes way beyond most people&#8217;s view of symmetry as just mirror images about a line. Amazing symmetries also exist in magnificently complex structures.  Mathematicians have described a structure called E8 that is the largest possible structure with unique symmetries.</p>
<p>E8 is a theoretical structure in 248 dimensions. More properly it is an object known as <em> the exceptional Lie group E<sub>8</sub></em>.</p>
<p>Enter theorist Garrett Lisi.  Very basically, he looks at the relationship between the known &#8220;elementary&#8221; 226 particles on to a representation on the 248 points of the E8. You can play with the particles and the E8 online at:<br />
<a title="Deferential Deometry EPE" href="http://deferentialgeometry.org/epe/">http://deferentialgeometry.org/epe/</a></p>
<div id="attachment_1009" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 460px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1009" title="elementary-particle-explorere-garrett-lisi" src="http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/elementary-particle-explorere-garrett-lisi.jpg" alt="Elementary Particle Explorer Garrett Lisi" width="450" height="416" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Elementary Particle Explorer Garrett Lisi</p></div>
<p>You can hear his presentation at the TED talks at:<br />
<a title="Deferential Deometry EPE" href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything.html">http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything.html</a></p>
<p>Or course there are detractors:<br />
<a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=garrett-lisi-e8-theory" target="_blank">http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=garrett-lisi-e8-theory</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/garrett-lisi-theory-of-everything-and-e8-symmetry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>light backwards is faster than light</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/light-backwards-is-faster-than-light/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/light-backwards-is-faster-than-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As if light wasn&#8217;t mystical enough&#8230; imagine light traveling backwards a a speed faster-than-light just to fit the other laws of light.  Yes strange indeed.
Yes, current theories did predict this bizarre possibility that Robert Boyd discovered.  Einstein, as it turns out, didn&#8217;t say nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if light wasn&#8217;t mystical enough&#8230; imagine light traveling backwards a a speed faster-than-light just to fit the other laws of light.  Yes strange indeed.</p>
<div id="attachment_867" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-867" title="weirdlight_zoom" src="http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/weirdlight_zoom.jpg" alt="Light traveling backward faster than the Speed of light, copyright University of Rochester" width="500" height="166" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Light traveling backward faster than the Speed of light, copyright University of Rochester</p></div>
<p>Yes, current theories did predict this bizarre possibility that Robert Boyd discovered.  Einstein, as it turns out, didn&#8217;t say nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, he said that &#8220;information can&#8217;t travel faster than light.&#8221;</p>
<p>This effect was created using exotic techniques and materials.</p>
<blockquote><p>Boyd explains, &#8220;The pulse of light is shaped like a hump with a peak and long leading and trailing edges. The leading edge carries with it all the information about the pulse and enters the fiber first. By the time the peak enters the fiber, the leading edge is already well ahead, exiting. From the information in that leading edge, the fiber essentially &#8216;reconstructs&#8217; the pulse at the far end, sending one version out the fiber, and another backward toward the beginning of the fiber.&#8221; &#8220;The backward pulse meets and cancels out the initial pulse, so only the final pulse remains.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>To read all about these strange behaviors see:<a title="Article on Backward fast light" href="http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=2544" target="_blank"> http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=2544</a></p>
<p>Check out this animation: <a title="Backward light animation" href="http://www.rochester.edu/news/photos/backward_light.mpg" target="_blank">http://www.rochester.edu/news/photos/backward_light.mpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/light-backwards-is-faster-than-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.rochester.edu/news/photos/backward_light.mpg" length="1708032" type="video/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shortest flash of light &#8211; strobes aren&#8217;t even close</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/shortest-flash-of-light-strobes-arent-even-close/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/shortest-flash-of-light-strobes-arent-even-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As American&#8217;s look up tonight to see the flashes of light produced by fireworks, they need to realize that those light bursts last a very long time.Â  To get a really really REALLY short flash one needs to work a lot harder.
Researchers have created the shortest-ever flash of light which lasted only 80 attoseconds (billionths [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mpq.mpg.de/cms/mpq/en/news/press/08_06_19.html"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-521" title="light-pulse-dn14172-1_350" src="http://bradcarlile.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/light-pulse-dn14172-1_350.jpg" alt="Max Planck Institute created image of light pulse" width="350" height="335" /></a>As American&#8217;s look up tonight to see the flashes of light produced by fireworks, they need to realize that those light bursts last a very long time.Â  To get a really <em>really REALLY</em> short flash one needs to work a lot harder.</p>
<p>Researchers have created the shortest-ever flash of light which lasted only 80 attoseconds (billionths of a billionth of a second).Â  They pulsed already fast pulses of light on specialized (chirped) mirrors to intersect on jets of neon gas to create this super-short pulses.</p>
<p>The 80 attosecond laser pulse that illuminates neon atoms that the first 2500 attosecond pulse is traveling through.Â  The longer laser pulse ionizes the neon atoms and causes them to glow.Â  All of this happens so quickly that we only see about one and and a half oscillations of the first pulse, basically just two high peaks and a deep wave valley between them. Again what we are seeing is not the first laser pulse but its ionizing effect on the neon atoms as it passes through them.</p>
<p>How what sorts of things happen on these time scales?Â  Well, to put all of this into perspective, it takes only 24 attoseconds for an electron to travel from one side of a hydrogen atom to the other.</p>
<p>How short can they go? &#8230;well according to Quantum physics the smallest measurement of time one <a title="Planck Time Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_time" target="_blank">Planck time</a> (10<sup>-44</sup> sec).Â  So this pulse was 80*10<sup>26</sup>; times longer.Â  So they still have some way to go <img src='http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My thoughts:</p>
<blockquote><p>Why does this matter to art or artists?  As we all come to grips with the ultimate realities it should inform our art.  Or maybe we should all dump conceptual art and head back to liturgical art.  Influences and inspirations can come from all fields of inquiry.</p></blockquote>
<p>Max-Planck Institute <a href="http://www.mpq.mpg.de/cms/mpq/en/news/press/08_06_19.html" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
<hr />For those of you confused on wheter if light is a wave or particle.Â  You must realize it is neither &#8212; it is its own thing.Â  Light has some qualities we ascribe to waves in our experience and some qualities we ascribe to particles in our experience.</p>
<p>Eric Towers put it this way (<a title="Eric Towers" href="http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn14172-fastestever-flashgun-captures-image-of-light-wave.html?DCMP=ILC-hmts&amp;nsref=news1_head_dn14172">Sat Jun 21 05:39:27 BST 2008</a>)</p>
<blockquote><p>Light is neither a wave nor a particle. A photon is a probability density function on the product space of positions and momenta. (Product space, classically. Adding relativity, the space is slightly deformed.) Insofar as this distribution can be projected onto the position subspace, the photon is a &#8220;smeared out&#8221; particle. Insofar as this distribution can be projected onto the momentum subspace, the photon is a &#8220;smeared out&#8221; wave.</p>
<p>The error is one of &#8220;cart before the horse&#8221;. &#8220;Wave&#8221; and &#8220;Particle&#8221; are idealizations created as models to help us understand the world. These two concepts are simplifications, fictions. There is absolutely no reason to believe that anything in the natural world somehow implements any of our fictions. So it is always backwards to ask &#8220;is a photon a wave?&#8221; or &#8220;is a photon a particle?&#8221;. It is proper to ask &#8220;what particle-like (or wave-like) behavior does this photon exhibit?&#8221; I.e. It is proper to ask to what degree some natural phenomenon can be adequately modeled by some idealization.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/shortest-flash-of-light-strobes-arent-even-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murray Gell-Mann: Beauty and truth in physics</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/murray-gell-mann-beauty-and-truth-in-physics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/murray-gell-mann-beauty-and-truth-in-physics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last year&#8217;s TED conference one of the lectures that was taped was by the polymath and physicist Murray Gell-Mann.  I highly recommend taking a look. http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/194
He talks a lot about symmetry.  Symmetry goes way beyond simple mirror images about a line. Amazing symmetries also exists in magnificantly complex structures such as as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last year&#8217;s TED conference one of the lectures that was taped was by the polymath and physicist Murray Gell-Mann.  I highly recommend taking a look. <a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/194" target="_blank">http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/194</a></p>
<p>He talks a lot about symmetry.  Symmetry goes way beyond simple mirror images about a line. Amazing symmetries also exists in magnificantly complex structures such as as <a href="http://www.aimath.org/E8/" target="_blank">E8</a>.  E8 is the largest possible immense structure with unique symmetry.  Basically things with some form of  symmetry have characteristics that don&#8217;t change under change.  What a better way to understand things that change and those characteristics. Beautiful.</p>
<p>And if you want to read more you can read his very approachable book, <a href="http://www.powells.com/biblio/17-9780716727255-2" target="_blank">&#8220;The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Gell-Mann in 1964 postulated the existence of quarks.  Then later described hadrons their puzzling physics, proposed the name &#8220;quark&#8221;, and won a Nobel prize for the quarks.  He has a wide and eclectic set of interests from Buddhism, East Asian antiquities, linguistics, bird watching, archeology and many others. He also invested a lot of effort into the study of complexity theory where he also was instrumental part of Santa Fe Institute (where complexity and other multi-disciplinary things are studied).</p>
<p>To learn more about symmetry, try these podcasts&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.studio360.org/episodes/2007/06/01" target="_blank">Studio 360 Podcast with Mario Livio: Symmetry </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime_20070419.shtml" target="_blank">BBC podcast on symmetry </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/misc/murray-gell-mann-beauty-and-truth-in-physics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futurism &amp; String Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/ponderings/futurism-string-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/ponderings/futurism-string-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradcarlile.com/blog/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been studying Futurist paintings for some time.  The notion of using different representations of movement and change in a still image is intriguing to me.  I also continue to read theoretical physics.  In my mind an artist must tap from all manner of sources and combine this with their unique experiences [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been studying Futurist paintings for some time.  The notion of using different representations of movement and change in a still image is intriguing to me.  I also continue to read theoretical physics.  In my mind an artist must tap from all manner of sources and combine this with their unique experiences to create interesting art.</p>
<p>Below, one of these images is Umberto Boccioni&#8217;s &#8220;Dynamism of a Soccer Player&#8221; from 1913 and the other is a modern 3D representation of the Calabi-Yau manifold which is used in various String theories of fundamental physics. <a href="http://bradcarlile.com/blog/?attachment_id=249" rel="attachment wp-att-249" title="Umberto Boccioni  Dynamism of a Soccer Player and Calabi Yau, 6 dimension projected in 3 dimensions"><img src="http://bradcarlile.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/umberto-boccioni-dynamism-calabi-yau.jpg" alt="Umberto Boccioni - Dynamism of a Soccer Player and Calabi Yau - 6 dimension projected in 3 dimensions" /></a></p>
<h2>Futurism</h2>
<p>Umberto Boccioni and the other futurists tried to come up with universal models of movement.  Boccioni said, <em>&#8220;Dynamism is the lyrical approach to forms, which are interpreted in the endless phenonmenon of the reality of absolute and relative motions of surroundings and object, down to  the formation of an overall phenomenon: surroundings + object.  It is the creation of a new form, intended to represent the relativity of mass and extension.  Between rotating and circling motion in other word, life itself is captured in the form which life engenders in its endless succession.&#8221;</em></p>
<h2>String Theory</h2>
<p>In various string theories of modern physics there are 10 or 11 dimensions with many of these extra 6-7 dimensions (beyond our 3 spatial and one time dimension) so small as to be undetectable in our experience.  These special dimensions must have special properties to fit all of the intrinsic properties of elementary particles.  These dimensions are described as Calabi-Yau spaces.  These manifolds can be visualized in a 3D projection.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory" target="_blank">Wikipedia entry for string theory</a>.</p>
<p>I think the ties are even closer than some of the visual connections that you may have noticed in a quick and cursory glance.  More at some point&#8230;</p>
<p>Image info: <em>Calabi-Yau manifold (3D projection), <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Calabi-Yau.png" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Calabi-Yau.png</a>  This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License. In short: you are free to share and make derivative works of the file under the conditions that you appropriately attribute it, and that you distribute it only under a license identical to this one.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradcarlile.com/blog/ponderings/futurism-string-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
